|
 |
| |
|
|
The Effectiveness of Plastic Encasement as a
Timber Preservative | Ben Brown | |
|
2007 |
|
|
For years, groups ranging from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service to the U.S Navy have tried to restrict the levels of
oxygen getting to marine timber to extend the performance
life of pilings. Until recently, pile wrapping provided the
best solution. Although typically difficult and expensive
to install, when used properly, wrapping was proven to
decrease oxygen levels in treated areas and thus provide
a longer life for the structure. However, wood expands
and contracts. Seams loosen, and over time, fasteners fail.
These actions result in easy entry for decomposers and a
clear path for water flow, parallel to the grain, providing
sustenance.
A study conducted by the Naval Civil Engineering Facilities
reviewed the encasement of timber pilings before driving.
"The Port of Tacoma used the former method in 1922 and
the piling is still in excellent condition today."3 (at the time
of publishing in 1987)
Full encapsulation provides the benefits of wrapping to the
entire pile and eliminates the weak points in the system.
Full encapsulation does not bond to the wooden core,
allowing independent expansion and contraction inside
the flexible membrane. This means the effectiveness of the
seal does not rely on tension, which inevitably fluctuates,
nor is the polymer protection susceptible to cracking
during freeze thaw cycles. Full encapsulation eliminates
seams and fasteners, which are the common failure points.
Furthermore, the protected structural system is created as
a single unit, in a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility,
eliminating the need for on site installation, where quality
control is difficult at best.
Full encapsulation provides the best defense against
borers and other decomposers by limiting entry into the
wooden core, and effectively suffocating whatever life may
be within, through the restriction of oxygen and light.
What happens if the encapsulation becomes
damaged?
Although remarkably durable, the polymer encapsulation
may become gouged or nicked in extreme transportation
or installation conditions (stabbed with a forklift, excavator,
etc.). Although abusive conditions should be avoided
whenever possible, and incidental damage repaired for
aesthetic purposes, the bottom line is, even when left
untreated, small holes and tears have a negligible effect on
|
performance. While organisms may gain minimal access to
the wood, unless the tear exposes significant area parallel to
the grain, sufficient water flow to provide enough oxygen to
support life cannot typically be achieved
Conclusion
The Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory suggests "In.areas
where repairs of chemically treated piling are soon required,
it may be advisable to install prewrapped, treated bearing
piling to avoid potentially catastrophic delays in wrapping."4
While the traditional wrapping of pressure treated wood is
currently an acceptable option in many locations, it is not
always a feasible solution, and is in most cases a temporary
one. Prevention is always better than treatment in the field.
The most effective method of limiting light and oxygen to
timber, and thus significantly increasing the survival rate of
structural timber in water is full encapsulation.
1. DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY,THE NAVY AND THE AIR FORCE
"Maintenance of Waterfront Facilities" (Army TM 5-622, Navy
MO-104, Air Force AFM 91-34)." June 1978: 2.1.1
2. Joseph Acosta, Andrew Cairns, Patrick King. Pile Wrap
Evaluation Study
Han-Padron Associates, LLP, New York, NY 10007
3, 4. D. Pendleton and T.O'Neill. Timber Piling Barrier and
Chemical Preservation Annual Costs Comparison. (N-1773)
NAVAL CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY, PORT HUENEME,
CALIFORNIA 93043. June 1987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|